Lance Armstrong giving a talk in 2007 – Photo by Cpl. William Howard, Combat Aviation Brigade, 1st Infantry Division via commons.wikimedia.org

“A forger of lies is a physician of no value.” – Job 13:4

Today, 1 in 4 children live in poverty.  They get ready for school and set out to dodge gang warfare — hungry ,but surviving. When they concede, they find a safety net in the gang life — lose sight of transcending their position and fall deeper into the life of drugs, prostitution and firearms.

Today, Lance Armstrong wakes up in his Malibu penthouse overlooking the sprite of sunshine bursting from the blue of the bikini spread waves. He’s wearing Prada and eating the best of organic food, fueling his suntanned physique. He’s safe and warm and full of wellness, having defeated cancer with a will unparalleled by many.

Seven-time Tour de France champion.

Billion-dollar Philanthropist.

King of the “Livestrong” bracelet, a national emblem of hope.

But he’s a liar.

And while I’m the first to practice the art of forgiveness, even I am losing my love in lieu of Lance’s other-Lance — the Lance who forced the members of his famed cycling team to dope if they wished to stay employed. And that just pisses me off.

If you ever saw the Denzel Washington-led film, American Gangster, you probably saw what a man of complexion looks like. Washington played the famed Frank Lucas — former cocaine kingpin of New York City — former inner city philanthropist, funding small businesses and turkey feeds. Lucas was a dicatator with a kind heart buried beneath brutality. He was a charitable-murderer.

Lance Armstrong is not a murderer. Don’t go that far. But he is a lying-philanthropist. And though he’s done great things — raised a billion dollars for cancer patients since 1998 — he is also the man who force-fed drugs down his employees’ mouths and covered over his lie with a blatant disrespect for his fans.

And now that his former employees are coming out one by one, admitting to Armstrong’s shady business, he stubbornly denies use of steroidal drugs. At least Lucas came clean. And though he lost an entire kingdom in the wake of his words of honesty, he relinquished, at least partly, the wrongs that swallowed his rights.

Armstrong is becoming the Pete Rose of cycling and that is just sad. Who would of thought a billion dollars would fade far into the background of such an abstract life-painting?

His seven championships and billion dollar project of hope mean less and less as the reports continue to come out. Because a man is measured by his integrity, not by words or his money, because everyone — whether wrong or right, holy or hateful —  will rot in a box in the bottom of the earth, so will Armstrong — billion dollars, good deeds and all.

So, if the answer is that Lance DID dope, I think the question should be, “Was it worth it?”

In a field of cyclists who were basically all doping, Armstrong was at the top. For seven straight years he dominated the Tour de France like nobody has or probably ever will. Will all of Roger Clemens’ pitching records be stripped because he used performance-enhancing drugs during the steroid era? But I’m getting off-topic.

If all of Armstrong’s records fall, it was probably worth it. It has to be. If the price of winning 7 Tours de France and having the pulpit from which to grow the Lance Armstrong Foundation is to have those titles stripped later on, don’t the ends justify the means?

Look at all the great work the LAF has done.

Millions of dollars for programs for people affected by cancer. Millions of people inspired by Lance’s story of survival. Are those people any less alive now that it comes out that Lance probably doped? Will the support for cancer survivors have been undone?

For a man who looked death in the face, I would imagine the ends justified the means.

In a sport where everyone was cheating, Lance Armstrong probably did too. And it helped him to do immeasurable good for the field of cancer research.

And while fair play in sports is something I think is REALLY REALLY REALLY important, I think that, for Lance (IF HE DID DOPE) the resulting contribution to cancer awareness surely justified doping at a time when “everyone was doing it.” If that’s how this thing goes down, he’ll have to live with that. And I think I’ll be good with it.